On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:01 +1100, James Morris wrote: > Any further thoughts on how to push the secmark integration forward? > > The secmark table patch should allow MAC rules to be administered > independently, and I know there has been some demand for the new (well, > now not so new) networking controls. Has the secmark table patch gone upstream yet? -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
