Re: X avcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glenn Faden wrote:
Eamon Walsh wrote:
OK, I worked on this today. The property polyinstantiation itself is easy enough, but I've run into a problem with the PropertyNotify events that occur when a polyinstantiated property is changed or deleted - everyone can see them! Some major changes to the event delivery model are probably going to be necessary to make this work.

I can't immediately see how it's done in Trusted Extensions. In TsolDeleteProperty there is just a regular DeliverEvents call to send the event.

I think there will have to be a way to pass some private data down with all events, and then have another hook call further down that gives a yes/no answer for each client.
You're probably right that unnecessary PropertyNotify events may be distributed to any client who has expressed interest in this event on the root window. I don't think this is a big problem, however. If the client cares to read the property whose atom is associated with the event it will get the value which matches its security context.

If your concern is that this presents a covert channel, that is an issue that we generally ignore. For example we don't prevent higher-level windows from generating exposure events which may be delivered to lower level windows. We only prevent normal clients from mapping windows into a Trusted Path workspace.

--Glenn

I'll press forward with this then, putting the event delivery on the to-do list.


--
Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux