On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxx): > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > > Judging by > > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9810.2/0705.html, > > > the option was actually introduced in 1998 because the use of > > > the struct was broken. Given that, are there any objections to the > > > following patch? > > > > Not from me. > > > > > > Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks, James. > > Do you prefer this over the other version which fixes up compilation > with strict type checking? I don't have a preference. > > If we do this, do we get rid of cap_t(), to_cap_t(), and kernel_cap_t > altogether? > > (For simplicity I'd like to make one of these patches a prereq to the > 64-bit capabilities patch) > > thanks, > -serge > -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
