Re: [PATCH 2/3] Changes to support plymouth working in enforcing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/12/19 10:43 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 April 2019 5:39:31 AM AEST Sugar, David wrote:
>> plymouth is started very early in the boot process.  Looks
>> like before the SELinux policy is loaded so plymouthd is
>> running as kernel_t rather than plymouthd_t.  Due to this
>> I needed to allow a few permissions on kernel_t to get
>> the system to boot.
> 
> Could plymouth re-exec itself or do a dynamic domain transition to get the
> right domain?
> 

I don't see a way in the plymouth.conf or other configuration file to 
have plymouth re-exec.




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux