Re: [PATCH 2/3] Changes to support plymouth working in enforcing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, 13 April 2019 5:39:31 AM AEST Sugar, David wrote:
> plymouth is started very early in the boot process.  Looks
> like before the SELinux policy is loaded so plymouthd is
> running as kernel_t rather than plymouthd_t.  Due to this
> I needed to allow a few permissions on kernel_t to get
> the system to boot.

Could plymouth re-exec itself or do a dynamic domain transition to get the 
right domain?

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/






[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux