On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:34:45 +0700 "Indra" <br0nky@yahoo.com> implied: > yeah...everybody will agree..new release is more secure than release > before....like Redhat 7.1 is more secure than Redhat 7.0 Out of the box yes. If a person does the proper things, one is no more/less secure than the other. The tools are there in both to make them equally secure. It isn't a point of more or less secure if one uses the proper methods and tools to tighten them up sufficiently. But, if all someone does is install it and not do anything else, the statement that 7.2 is more secure than 7.1 is accurate. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "MD. Tauhidul Islam" <tauhid_buet@yahoo.com> > To: <security-discuss@linuxsecurity.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 10:54 PM > Subject: Security > > > > I heard lots of people saying that RH 7.2 is very much secured than > > previous releases. I'm using RH 7.1 > > can u guys tell me what are the special new security features > > included in RH7.2 ?? > > > > regards > > > > Tauhid > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----- To unsubscribe email > > security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com with > > "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message. > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- To unsubscribe email > security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com with "unsubscribe" > in the subject of the message. > -- Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the answer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@linuxsecurity.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
