On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:07:23PM -0400, Post, Mark K wrote: > I noticed that in the latest code drop, the devfsd RPM is no longer present. > Was this intentional? If so, what was the reason? Many known security problems in the current source code that are not fixed. We will try to get the current s390 drivers working even without devfs. If we change our mind on this, devfsd would be included but in any case disabled by default. cu, Florian La Roche
