Sorry, yes, i'm running under vm... -- Todd Blevins On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Post, Mark K wrote: > Again, you didn't say if you are running under VM, but if you are, > then you can logon, and turn on a CP trace, which will help figure > out where the system is, and whether it really is looping or not. > These kinds of situations have come up in the past, and with some > digging, the reporter, and IBM were able to figure things out. If > you are not running under VM, then there's not a lot you can do to > gather any sort of diagnostics. > > Mark Post > > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Blevins [mailto:tblevins@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:35 PM > To: Post, Mark K > Subject: RE: [Redhat-s390-list] latest build > > > > How? There is no prompt...it hangs here: > ctc0: connected with remote side > ctc0 Link encap:Serial Line IP > inet addr:10.1.1.2 P-t-P:10.1.1.1 Mask:255.255.255.255 > UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 10.1.1.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ctc0 > 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ctc0 > 127.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 lo > 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ctc0 > Starting portmap. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't do anything from here... > >
