On 06/16, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 06/15/2016 08:54 PM, Stephano Cetola wrote: > >I'm working on getting rpmdeps to return a "Requires" result for scripts > >with "/usr/bin/env python" (more descriptive than the current result of > >"Requires:/usr/bin/env"). I've looked over rpmfcSCRIPT and I have some > >ideas on how to remedy the issue. > > > >Is this something that would be of interest, or is there any way I could > >bend this project to your needs? > > See http://rpm.org/ticket/136 and http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7f73133cbb35ed0f21938996018654391b0a7d7 Perfect, these are exactly the types of cases we are trying to remedy on our side. > > In hindsight, with survivers from Fedora's UsrMove crash still wandering > aimlessly on the shore... I find myself thinking perhaps it wouldn't be so > bad to use build environment $PATH to resolve non-absolute arguments into > absolute ones (and thus, into file dependencies). IFF the argument can be This seems reasonable. I'll dig in a bit and see what I find. Here is the ticket on my side: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9692 > resolved within the build environment, that is, otherwise throw a warning > maybe. That's more or less what's outlined in the ticket. > > - Panu - > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
