On 06/15, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 06/15/2016 11:54 AM, Stephano Cetola wrote: > > I'm working on getting rpmdeps to return a "Requires" result for scripts > > with "/usr/bin/env python" (more descriptive than the current result of > > "Requires:/usr/bin/env"). I've looked over rpmfcSCRIPT and I have some > > ideas on how to remedy the issue. > > > > Is this something that would be of interest, or is there any way I could > > bend this project to your needs? > > > > Cheers, > > Stephano > > Well, I really don't see how you could generate an appropriate "Requires" that > matches "there is a 'python' executable somewhere in the user's PATH". Fedora > packages are already expected to replace #!/usr/bin/env python with > #!/usr/bin/python (or even /usr/bin/python2.7 or 3.5). Indeed, "appropriate" is the key term there. I can see how to return something that is appropriate for us, but not for general consumption. We use rpmdeps as part of our build system (OE), and I can do some high level processing after rpmdeps to figure out what executables are on the path, and hence what the correct dependencies should be. I figured that I should ask if any of this made sense in the general case, though my initial impression was much the same as yours. > > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 > NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx > Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
