# defining __open is illegal in a generic environment, i.e. exactly where you try to # define it. It should be # defined and used as FTS_open instead.
IMHO,
Chris.
Wysłane z telefonu Samsung
-------- Oryginalna wiadomość --------
Od: Florian Festi
Data:12.08.2014 10:34 (GMT+01:00)
Do: rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Temat: Re: fts.c has no business to #define reserved identifiers
On 08/10/2014 10:25 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
> Is:
>
> # define __set_errno(val) (*__errno_location ()) = (val)
>
> # define __open open
>
> # define __close close
>
> # define __fchdir fchdir
>
>
>
> Why do you do that? It is illegal.
Please don't tell the Police. We all have families.
If you look a bit closer you might realize that this passage is
surrounded by the #else block of a #if defined(_LIBC) directive. So this
is only done on systems that do not come with a libc. I really have no
clue why we are supporting them but someone thought this would be
important back in 2002.
Florian
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
> Is:
>
> # define __set_errno(val) (*__errno_location ()) = (val)
>
> # define __open open
>
> # define __close close
>
> # define __fchdir fchdir
>
>
>
> Why do you do that? It is illegal.
Please don't tell the Police. We all have families.
If you look a bit closer you might realize that this passage is
surrounded by the #else block of a #if defined(_LIBC) directive. So this
is only done on systems that do not come with a libc. I really have no
clue why we are supporting them but someone thought this would be
important back in 2002.
Florian
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
