Turns out the latter had no epoch while the first did. :(
From: Greg Swift
Sent: 3/7/2014 4:46 PM
To: General discussion about the RPM package manager
Subject: Re: Versioning issue
Can you provide the output of this for both of those packages:
rpm -qp --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}' <filename>
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I use symantic versioning to build our RPMs from jenkins from source automatically. 'Stable' releases are straight symvers (1.1.0-beta.1, etc). 'Dev' or 'unstable' append the datetime such as '1.2.0-beta.1.140215223311'. It almost always works. Sometimes it doesn't. According to rpmdev-vercmp, they should work when they don't. An example of a time yum refuses to update:Any help is appreciated, i'd rather not have to change the versioning scheme if not required, it's nice to have it match the versioning scheme we have in house by default.
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
