Hi Jason,
Shouldn't you be using yum, that's what its for ie installs/upgrades whilst automatically taking care of dependencies?
From: Jason Henderson <jasonhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2013 5:19 AM
Subject: rpm update on multilib system ignores duplicate package name with different arch on command line
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
Shouldn't you be using yum, that's what its for ie installs/upgrades whilst automatically taking care of dependencies?
Cheers
Chris Moden
Chris Moden
From: Jason Henderson <jasonhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2013 5:19 AM
Subject: rpm update on multilib system ignores duplicate package name with different arch on command line
I have a Linux distro (based on CentOS) which contains both i686 and x86_64 versions of some rpm packages. In the example below I want to upgrade the installed glibc.i686, glibc.x86_64 and glibc-common.i686 packages at the same time.
As shown the rpm command ignores the glibc.x86_64 package when glibc.i686 proceeds it in the list of packages to upgrade. The end result being that the glibc.x86_64 package is removed from the system.
If I omit the --nodeps option in the command there are many dependency errors produced since the command is effectively removing the required glibc.x86_64 package.
I can reinstall the required glibc.x86_64 package manually but my end goal is to be able to omit the --nodeps option to get a proper dependency check and have the i686 and x86_64 packages upgraded correctly at the same time.
My question is, should rpm handle this case or is such a multilib upgrade not supported?
Example:
[root@64-bit]# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.x86_64
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.i686
glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.i686
[root@64-bit]# rpm -Uvh --nodeps glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm nscd-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
warning: glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
warning: package glibc = 2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 was already added, skipping glibc = 2.12-1.107.el6_4.5
Preparing...
1:glibc [ 33%]
2:glibc-common [ 67%]
3:nscd [100%]
[root@64-bit]# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.x86_64
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.i686
glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.4.i686
[root@64-bit]# rpm -Uvh --nodeps glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm nscd-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
warning: glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
warning: package glibc = 2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 was already added, skipping glibc = 2.12-1.107.el6_4.5
Preparing...
1:glibc [ 33%]
2:glibc-common [ 67%]
3:nscd [100%]
[root@64-bit]# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-common-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686
glibc-2.12-1.107.el6_4.5.i686
Thanks.
Jason
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list