Thanks Greg, appreciate your comments. Cheers. Jupiter On 9/19/12, Greg Swift <gregswift@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Confirmed. One of the precepts from the Fedora/Red Hat side of things is > that software installation should always be possible completely unattended. > I'd assume the other RPM based distros agree based on current state of > affairs. > On Sep 18, 2012 10:02 PM, "jupiter" <jupiter.hce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I added a bash read to rpm spec, it did not work during the package >> installation. I then found there was a discussion in >> http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/interactive/ many years ago. Could >> anyone kindly confirm that the current RPM is still not supporting >> (will never support) interactive license agreement? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jupiter >> _______________________________________________ >> Rpm-list mailing list >> Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list >> > _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
