Re: RPM or YUM does not support interactive license agreement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Confirmed.  One of the precepts from the Fedora/Red Hat side of things is that software installation should always be possible completely unattended. I'd assume the other RPM based distros agree based on current state of affairs.

On Sep 18, 2012 10:02 PM, "jupiter" <jupiter.hce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I added a bash read to rpm spec, it did not work during the package
installation. I then found there was a discussion in
http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/interactive/ many years ago. Could
anyone kindly confirm that the current RPM is still not supporting
(will never support) interactive license agreement?

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Jupiter
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux