RE: building a package that can not be upgraded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



More specifically I wanted to remind users to "uninstall old package, then install new one"

Regards
Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stuart D Gathman
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 6:45 PM
To: Valery Reznic; General discussion about the RPM package manager
Subject: Re: building a package that can not be upgraded

On Jul 17, Valery Reznic transmitted in part:

> Interesting example, but still here upgrade should be disable if some 
> condition is true (or false :) Initial questions was how to disable it 
> unconditionally and I wandered why one may want such a thing.

I think what the OP had in mind was a simple way to prevent auto-updating with rpm -Fv *.rpm or rpm -Uv *.rpm, but still allow manual updating with rpm -Uv --force problempackage.rpm _______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux