Re: question about package conflicts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Florian Festi wrote:

Dave Peterson wrote:
I'm not familiar with the concept of package colors.  What are
they?
Also, it looks like the comparison is influenced by the color
bits and preferred file color associated with a transaction
set.  What are these?

There are three colors: 32 bit binaries (1), 64 bit binaries (2) and all other files (0). Yes, colors are numbers in this rainbow.


There are up to 4 colors (with 0 == "uncolored" a 5th value), and you've
neglected the odd mips architecture which is mapped to 0x4 as a color.

The 0x8 color bit is currently unused.

Files with colors 1 and 2 do not conflict even if their content differs and the file with the preferred arch is used and the other is ignored or silently overwritten. No one said it is a beautiful solution...


There's nothing whatsoever pretty about multilib. Why do two different
copies of all libraries needed again? Users couldn't care less about
what arch (or color) their libraries and executables are.

73 de Jeff

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux