In RPM 5 (http://rpm5.org) it work well
Also the test case (http://rpm.org/attachment/ticket/10/a.spec) work correctly in RPM5.
Regards
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Xavier Toth wrote:Buildroot from spec is ignored on purpose in rpm 4.6.0. That specs should
> My spec files which build on Fedora 9 rpm 4.4.2.3 don't build on
> Fedora 10 rpm 4.6.0. It appears that the Buildroot definition is being
> ignored. If I use --buildroot on the command line they build but this
> isn't a good solution. Is this a rpmbuild bug or feature? Is it
> specific to Fedora possibly?
(have to) define their own buildroot is simply bad design and a leftover
from ancient times.
There's one known bug wrt the new buildroot handling, namely that specs
which have subpackages whose version differs from the main package
version doesn't work right: http://rpm.org/ticket/10
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
