Re: signing RPMs without a passphrase?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jay,

On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Jay Yarbrough wrote:

My personal preference is to batch sign them after creation.  However,
it should also be possible to use 'expect' to pass in the passphrase
during the build process.

It looks like that's what other have recommended too - it wouldn't be too difficult, but we're looking for a more standard way of doing this. It could be argued that a passphrase is required to be "standard", but I'll omit that from my argument ;)

RE the batch signing - I'd thought of that as well, but our RPM creation tools create an RPM repository in the process, so remembering to batch sign them would be a human-required intervention.

thanks!
-lev

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux