On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:54 PM, Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me why, on a newly-installed (from kickstart)
minimal CentOS system, some of the packages fail verification
because of timestamp differences on some files?
For example:
# rpm --verify device-mapper
.......T /usr/include/libdevmapper-event.h
.......T /usr/include/libdevmapper.h
.......T d /usr/share/man/man8/dmsetup.8.gz
Now, it would be possibly understandable if the files that were
changed were config files, but those listed above are a couple of
headers and a man page.
Why would the timestamps be different than the metadata in the RPM
database?
The issue is peculier to kickstart & anaconda, not rpm. I have
personally
seen the rpm --verify complaints, but only immediately after kickstart/
anaconda
installs/upgrades.
Meanwhile, its easier to just fix the mtimes than to try to understand
Why ... ?
Here's a means to reestablish file mtimes whenever necessary using --
setmtimes
popt alias wrapper to the necessary touch(1) command.
Disclaimer: I haven't tested this --setmtimes alias for over a year,
its just some
litter that I happen to have lying around.
Add this popt alias for --setmtimes to /etc/popt:
rpm alias --setmtimes -q --qf '[\[ -L %{FILENAMES:shescape} \] ||
touch -m -c --date="%{FILEMTIMES:date}" %{FILENAMES:shescape}\n]' \
--pipe "sh"
--POPTdesc=$"set mtime of file(s) in a package"
Choose some package "foo" to test.
Type
rpm --setmtimes foo
to verify functionality. Lather rinse repeat until you are confident
that --setmtimes does what its supposed to do.
(aside) I considered carrying --setmtimes as Yet Another option in
rpm, but
the pain of adding --setmtimes to rpm does not justify the gain of
repairing (and concealing) kickstart/anaconda flaws imho.
YMMV, everyone's does.
hth
73 de Jeff
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
