On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:44:18AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 2/10/08, Tony Earnshaw <tonni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx skrev, on 10-02-2008 12:46: > > > > > I'm trying to rebuild some src rpms that I d/l'ed from atrpms. > > > > > > Their spec files have a "%kmdl" directive in them. > > > > > > how might I handle this ? Install atrpms-rpm-config. As well as any kernel headers/sources you need to build kmdls for. > I've run into this many times. My solution is avoid ATRPMs at all > cost. AT created his own rpm macro scheme and unless you install his > devel packages, you will have trouble. So I avoid them. What's wrong with defining macros? Nowadays even cmake defines its own macros (nothing against cmake or its macros), and a more complex setup like kernel modules is in need for abstaction even more so. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpWC9HmiOr3Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
