Jeff Johnson wrote: > Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > >yes, certainly agree with that message > > > >(just like debian people have long known dpkg isn't > >where they want to be fiddling) > > So apt is necessary to configure dpkg? I dinna know that ... [Of course Jeff is having fun with us...] 'apt' is as necessary for 'dpkg' as 'yum'/'urpmi'/etc. is for 'rpm'. Which is to say that it is not. But it is still very useful and arguably a good way to use the tools. Bob _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
