On 6/15/07, tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx <tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks I do have opposite (rpm -e instead of rpm -Uvh) matching but reverse in my %postun (not %preun but there are no files installed to uninstall other than a temp directory which the RPMs are stored during installation). Also they are in reverse, which I believe is correct. For instance: %post rpm -Uvh x.rpm rpm -Uvh y.rpm rpm -Uvh z.rpm ... ... %postun rpm -e z rpm -e y rpm -e x
Technically, erasures should be the reverse of installs, yes. I would use %preun rather than %postun for similar symmetry reasons. Ultimately it won't matter much for "package bundels". You're likely better off if you just invoke rpm once with all packages in arghlist, rather than trying to maintain some order in the "package bundle" with single package invocations. RPM will re-order using internal dependency information, and will handle possible A <-> B interdependencies. 73 de Jeff _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
