On Thursday 01 February 2007, Jos Vos wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:50:04PM +0100, Martin Koller wrote: > > Is there any way to solve this or is RPM simply not made for this > > scenario ? > > The latter. You should provide new RPM's of the full product and > give them a newer version and/or release number, so that you can > upgrade with "rpm -U ...". That's a pitty, as a new package would mean ~250 MBs ... which is not really an option if I want to deliver a patch for 1 file ... Thanks nevertheless for the quick reply. -- MfG, () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail Martin /\ - against microsoft attachments Computers and Internet gave you freedom. TCPA would TAKE your FREEDOM! http://www.againsttcpa.com _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
