--- Erez Zilber <erezz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Valery Reznic wrote:
> > --- Erez Zilber <erezz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm building rpms for 2 different distributions
> >> (SuSE & RedHat) using a
> >> single spec file. In order to do that, I'm using
> >> "%package". The 2
> >> packages contain more or less the same files, but
> >> the package name is
> >> different.
> >>
> >
> > You can make use %if and/or %? construction to
> make
> > you package name, rpm filename, filelist depend on
> > distribution. No need for subpackages.
> >
> > Valery
> >
> >
> Using something like:
>
> %if "%{_vendor}" == "suse"
> %if %sles_version == 10
> %define _build_name_fmt
> %_arch/sles-name-%{version}.%{release}.%_arch.rpm
> %endif
> %else
> %if %_vendor == "redhat"
> %define _build_name_fmt
> %_arch/redhat-name-%{version}.%{release}.%_arch.rpm
> %endif
> %endif
As long as i remember, %define "work" always, so this
code really problematic.
>
> was problematic and results in behavior like having
> 2 debuginfo rpms in
> RedHat instead of 1 normal rpm and 1 rpm with
> debuginfo.
>
> Why don't you recommend using "%package"?
I just suggested another approach to solve your
problem.
You can have a look in
/usr/share/doc/rpm-<version>/conditionalbuilds
By the way, what do you trying to achive ?
Do you want only rpm filenames different, or package
names different too ?
If only rpm name, than something like
_build_name_fmt
%_arch/%{name}-%{version}.%{release}.%_arch.{DISTRO}.rpm
should be enough.
Valery.
>
> Thanks,
> Erez
> >
> >> The problem that I'm trying to solve is that when
> I
> >> build the binary rpm
> >> from the src rpm, I want to create only the
> package
> >> for the distribution
> >> that I run on: if I build it on a SuSE machine, I
> >> want to create only
> >> the binary rpm for SuSE and not the binary rpm
> for
> >> RedHat.
> >>
> >> I know that if I don't have "%files <package
> name>"
> >> in the spec file,
> >> the rpm for that package will not be created. Can
> I
> >> do that dynamically?
> >> Is there another solution for this problem?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
____________________________________________________________
> >
> >> Erez Zilber | 972-9-971-7689
> >>
> >> Software Engineer, Storage Team
> >>
> >> Voltaire ? _The Grid Backbone_
> >>
> >> __
> >>
> >> www.voltaire.com <http://www.voltaire.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rpm-list mailing list
> >> Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rpm-list mailing list
> > Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
