I haven't seen this come through. At 3:19 PM +0800 11/27/06, Nerazzurri wrote: >> >> None of the above should be considered criticism, just history. >> >> There are two needs if one wants to protect against rpmdb data loss. >> >> The most important is saving a copy of /var/lib/rpm/Packages routinely. >> All other information in an rpmdb can be regenerated from a reasonably >> recent copy of Packages. And in most cases a depsolver like >> yum/smart/apt/poldek >> will reinstall the packages that have changed since the last copy of >> Packages >> was saved. >> > >but how can i know which version of "/var/lib/rpm/Packages" is correct >and work well, if i backup a corrupted "Packages", the backup work will >be senseless, isnt it? :-) The "right" way would be to make a copy of the Packages file, check it, and only save it if the check passes. According to Jeff, the proper check is to do a "rpm --rebuilddb" with that Packages file and see if it works, but I haven't tried that method. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' The Great Writ <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' is no more. <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
