> > > I suppose I could install the "updated" files under a new name in a > > > known location, them apply the patch. Would that be the standard > > > way of doing what I'm trying to do? > > > > > > Sorry... what I said won't work. I don't want to install the patch > > file itself, and, IIUC, it is not a good idea to overwrite the yum > > config files. > > Supply the patch file (or the complete file itself) as a 'here' > document in %post, or a sed script. Since it is not part of > %files, rpm won't complain about a conflict. Of course, > rpm -V will report that the file has changed, but that is > as expected. Excuse me if this is a silly question, but what do you mean by a "'here' document"? Do you have any examples? Thanks so much! _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
