Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
From: Christian Goetze <cg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:56:02 -0800
Cc:
Reply-to: RPM Package Manager <rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

It would seem that it doesn't.
--
cg

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
  - From: Jos Vos

Prev by Date: Using RPM as non-root
Next by Date: Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
Previous by thread: Using RPM as non-root
Next by thread: Re: Doesn't "rpm -e" erase in reverse dependency order?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RPM Ecosystem] [Linux Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [IETF Discussion]

Powered by Linux