Seems like a sane idea to me. You get revision control of your configuration, which is a good thing. You could do it as a patch, or write a pre-install handler script to make the changes for you... Joe Van Dyk wrote:
Say I want to add the following lines to /etc/sysctl.conf and do it via a RPM: kernel.shmmax = 200000000 kernel.shmall = 20000000 Would my RPM just contain a patch? Or would I not want to do this kind of thing through an RPM? Our software requires a bunch of changes to a linux box in order to run (modified kernel, the above change, a new compiler, etc). RPMs are a sane way of pushing out the changes to the machines, right? Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
-- Marcin Krzysztof Porwit mporwit@xxxxxxxxxxxx #include <stddisclaimer.h> _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list