On Thursday, 22 December 2005, at 10:48:40 (-0800), Christian Goetze wrote: > ># lsof -d txt > > Neat... Neat? Reimplementing "lsof -d txt" in every program with run-time configuration-independent search paths is "neat?" Clearly your definition of "neat" bears a suspicious resemblence to my definition of "nuts." > What I am looking for is a way to make relocatable rpms out of > software that wasn't designed with this in mind, If you can't fudge it with symlinks, use other software. In any event, this list is the wrong tree, and the barking should probably stop. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Quit playin' games with my heart before you tear us apart. I should've known from the start before you got into my heart." -- Backstreet Boys _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
