Toralf Lund <toralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 11/02/2005 09:04 AM added: > 1. 'rpm -U' is equivalent to 'rpm -i' on the package files specified, > followed by 'rpm -e' of any older versions of those packages that > are already installed. Not wanting to argue about it, but shouldn't that actually instead be the other way around?: rpm -e oldversion followed by rpm -i newversion because... if both versions contained file 'A', wouldn't that mean that 'A' now contains the new code, and then because the erase happened second, that 'A' would then be erased? _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
