Jason Pyeron wrote:
I know this is not the answer to your question per say but,
does rpm --nosignature --nodigest -i help any?
Depends on how you see it. This will help if the key is actually
missing, but redhat-install-packages seems to report key error even when
it isn't (and the package is signed), i.e. in cases where a simple rpm
-i (or rpm -U) will happily install the package.
In other words, it may seem like GPG-signed packages simply can't be
installed using the Red Hat 9 version of redhat-install-packages...
Actually, I thought I had done this successfully in the past, but
perhaps not; like I said, "rpm -U" will often work for the same
packages, and even the "package group" interface of
redhat-config-packages may be able to handle them. In any case, we now
need to distribute software for which we only have a signed package, to
customers (still) using Red Hat 9. I'd really like to allow them use the
GUI when installing, but on our test setup at least, that just won't
work ;-( And I'm talking about 3rd party software (used by one of our
own applications) that I'd rather not rebuild from scratch if I can
avoid it...
The bug does not indicate one way or another on this.
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
