Re: changelog strangeness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 31 January 2005, at 14:48:55 (-0500),
Aaron Bennett wrote:

> %changelog
> * Mon Jan 31 2004 Aaron Bennett <aaron.bennett@xxxxxxxx> 0:1.0-0.lvn.1
               ^^^^
> - Update to ndiswrapper version 1.0

It's 2005, Aaron. :)

> error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
>
> How can this be?
> 
> We're going from:
> Epoch: 0
> Version: 0.12
> Release: 0.lvn.1
> 
> to
> 
> Epoch: 0
> Version: 1.0
> Release: 0.lvn.1
> 
> Don't tell me I need to increment the Epoch?  1.0 has got to be
> bigger than 0.12.

Did you actually read the error message?  It points to the %changelog,
not the epoch/version/release.

Read the error again.  Then look at your typo (noted above).  Then
slap yourself upside the head. :)

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "When I get the courage up to love somebody new, it always falls
  apart 'cause they just can't compare to you."
                          -- Boyz II Men, "Four Seasons of Loneliness"

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux