RPM DB corruption - LD_KERNEL_ASSUME or LD_ASSUME_KERNEL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi @ll,

I am getting the infamous RPM DB corruption error.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115432

Of-course I did all that was mentioned in 
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2004-010.html 

i.e set the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and RPM_FORCE_NTPL env
vars.
But still the error persisted. But one of my collegues
has told me that he tried with setting
LD_KERNEL_ASSUME, and it works (i.e the rpm db is
consistent), huh ?

I googled and found that there is definitely some
confusion over LD_ASSUME_KERNEL/LD_KERNEL_ASSUME,
though in informal lists.

http://www.junlu.com/msg/101907.html 

Has anyone faced a similar kind of thing or can anyone
tell me if both are equivalent ?. Any pointers will be
much appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
-- 
Manoj




		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux