Greetings. In article <20041221023643.GA5077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Proulx wrote: > Tristan Miller wrote: >> Is there anything I can do to avoid or circumvent this problem? > > I really think you need to coordinate with the gcc package to avoid > the obsoleting of the gpp package name. That is the right solution. I'll give this a try, but I think this might involve contacting numerous packagers and vendors too see if their RPM of gcc or gcc-c++ has the dependency. Regards, Tristan -- _ _V.-o Tristan Miller [en,(fr,de,ia)] >< Space is limited / |`-' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= <> In a haiku, so it's hard (7_\\ http://www.nothingisreal.com/ >< To finish what you _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
