Re: Package name conflict

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greetings.

In article <20041221023643.GA5077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tristan Miller wrote:
>> Is there anything I can do to avoid or circumvent this problem?
> 
> I really think you need to coordinate with the gcc package to avoid
> the obsoleting of the gpp package name.  That is the right solution.

I'll give this a try, but I think this might involve contacting numerous
packagers and vendors too see if their RPM of gcc or gcc-c++ has the
dependency.

Regards,
Tristan

-- 
   _
  _V.-o  Tristan Miller [en,(fr,de,ia)]  ><  Space is limited
 / |`-'  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=  <>  In a haiku, so it's hard
(7_\\    http://www.nothingisreal.com/   ><  To finish what you

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux