On Wednesday, 24 November 2004, at 09:15:19 (+0100), Diana Bosio wrote: > And in any case having an rpm requiring and providing the very same > file is not logical and very confusing, it sounds like a hack, and > an ugly one at that. It's not at all confusing, and it's certainly quite logical. Take bash for example. It requires /bin/sh and /bin/bash for shell scripts (e.g., %post). This is perfectly valid and predictable. bash also provides these things, obviously, which is again perfectly valid and predictable. The real problem here is that your script needs to be enhanced to account for these things. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "With every kiss our love is like brand new, and every star up in the sky was made for me and you. Still we both know that the road is long. But we know that we will be together because our love is strong." -- Firehouse, "Love of a Lifetime" _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
