On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:23:13AM -0500, Robert Lehr wrote: > Yes, this is not an issue. However, its harmlessness is simply a side > effect of this particular case. I consider this to be an instance of > a egregious problem with RPM,, that is its ability to establish > circular dependencies within groups of RPMs. What's the problem? RPM can handle the situation fine, and sometimes it's a representation of actual reality. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
