subtle issue on the use of configuration files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Folks,

I'm using rpm-4.0.4-7x-18 on RedHat 7.3.  I've found a small issue with
the use of rpm that I would like to run past you guys.  I believe I under-
stand the reason rpm acts the way it does -- I'd just like more knowledgeable
folks to confirm my suspicion.

I have a configuration file that is being install by an example rpm named
myapp-1.01.i386.rpm.  The same configuration was then slightly changed by
a second rpm named myapp-patch-1.01p1.i386.rpm.  At this point myapp-1.01
and myapp-patch-1.01p1 are installed.  Finally, the same configuration file
was changed back to the exact same content found in rpm myapp-1.01 by an
upgrade using myapp-patch-1.01p2.i386.rpm, so only myapp-1.01 and
myapp-patch-1.01p2 are installed in the final scenario.

What I found was the configuation file in myapp-patch-1.01p2 would not 
install.  My guess is that the reason it would not install was the
version of the configuration file in myapp-1.01 matched the version in
myapp-patch-1.01p2 *EVEN THOUGH* the most recently installed version of
the file.  The configuration file would install if I changed it ever so
slightly, creating a third instance of the file.

Is this a known feature?  Perhaps it is a bug?  If it is a known feature
could anyone point out a source of documentation for this so I can read
up on it?

Thank you,
Joel Breazeale

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux