>> > Why not just say that the payload can be compressed, implementation >> > specific, and that gzip support is required, but bzip2 support >> > is optional, and other types of compression can/will be added >> > if/when necessary. That's what I would do anyways, your LSB >> > mileage may vary ... >> >> If I can build a package that can't be installed everywhere, then the >> standard has failed ... > >By that criterion, the cause may be hopeless. What about stuff like >glibc versions? That's abstracted away; depending on 'lsb' (or for 2.0, 'lsb-core') gives you a promise about certain behaviors from glibc and other libraries and there's no need (nor is it allowed) to depend on specific glibc versions. _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
