On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:40:01AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:34:45AM -0500, sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I guess you could say that they are more "informational" files? They are > > unique to our process and not "owned" by any application... > > No problem, then. Make an RPM which contains those files, and there you go. Just don't mark the %config(noreplace) or your upgrades won't act as desired - but it should just work out of the box. Paul _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
