On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 16:53, Paolo Campanella wrote: > Now, although db_verify makes things look really bad: [...] > This makes me think that somehow I've ended up with an incorrect version > of Berkeley DB which makes things look worse than they are. This box was > upgraded many time over the years as you can tell from the above. I've determined that my database is in db.1.85 format, and I can db1_dump185 all files successfully, except for packages.rpm: ============================================== [paolo@modemsza rpm-db-copy]$ db1_dump185 -f triggerindex.dump triggerindex.rpm [paolo@modemsza rpm-db-copy]$ db1_dump185 -f packages.dump packages.rpm db1_dump185: packages.rpm: Invalid argument [paolo@modemsza rpm-db-copy]$ file requiredby.rpm requiredby.rpm: Berkeley DB 1.85 (Hash, version 2, native byte-order) [paolo@modemsza rpm-db-copy]$ file packages.rpm packages.rpm: data ============================================== The start of the packages.rpm does indeed look different to the rest. So I suppose I'm now asking for any advice on how to recover data from a trashed db.1.85 file ;) Bye Paolo _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list