Re: Install sequencing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 12 April 2004, at 12:37:31 (-0700),
Aaron Hanson wrote:

> Yes; all the run-time dependencies are correct. The reason I like
> breaking things up into multiple rpm transactions is because it
> provides more progress information to stdout and stderr. If I
> remember correctly, even 'rpm -Uv' is very quiet for a long time if
> it is working on a large set of packages....

rpm -Uvh *.rpm

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Men are not subtle.  We are obvious.  Women know what men want.  Men
  know what men want.  What do we want?  We want women!  That's it.
  It's the only thing we know for sure."             -- Jerry Seinfeld


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux