On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mer, 11/02/2004 à 16:54 -0500, Matt Pounsett a écrit : > > > > right to the spec file for the RPM that is mistakenly requiring it. > > > In other words, "lie, and say that we provide it". > > > > Ah, okay... creative kludge .. I like it. :) > > Thanks for the reply. > > Evil kludge is more like it. You can use this instead : > > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > Yeah, but that is yet another evil kludge in that chances are you will not manually get all the real dependencies right. If your doing this for a non-published package I personally think your doing a favor to yourself by using the first kludge, in that at least on your systems you will at least catch the real missing dependencies. Still, I think we probably do something like the "NoRequires" to specifically override the auto depedency generation. Cheers...james > Cheers, > _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
