seth vidal wrote : > Take a look at the above program, run it against a set of packages and > see what bugs you can find. > I'd encourage anyone looking for explanations of the format to look at > the dtds and look at the mailing list archives: > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-metadata/ > > let me know what is broken or not-quite-right. Generating the repodata works fine for me. A quick glance at the gzipped xml files shows nothing unusual... it even looks like like they pretty much contain what is said in the documentation ;-) Great work. Many thanks to you seth and all the others who participated in getting this common representation finally together. It's going to make repository administrators' life so much easier, as well as open great new possibilities wrt package indexing and searching. Let me know when/if there is a daily yum snapshot which starts using this repodata, as I'd be more than glad to generate it for all ayo.freshrpms.net and ask for massive testing :-) Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow) - Linux kernel 2.4.22-1.2163.nptl Load : 1.00 1.05 0.80 _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
