On Saturday 03 January 2004 22:12, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:11:47AM +1300, Michael Honeyfield wrote: > > > > foo = 12:1.0-17 > > > > foo = 0:2.0-1 > > > > > > Zero is before 12. So, stuck forever. > > > > so with and increased version number the damage inflicted by epochs has > > to stay? Just making sure I understand. > > Yeah. Because otherwise, how would RPM know that epoch-less package X was > supposed to be before or after the epoch'd ones? A package with a missing Epoch is considered to have epoch=0, so actually no package is "epoch-less"... Mihai _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
