Re: Mem utilization on Red Hat 9 brain tickler.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No I think it just means you know more => have more to forget...

I am also scratching my brain (I am old too) and I believe it is to do with kernel bigmem settings, run uname -a on both systems to see what they report.

JohnR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: shrike <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Mem utilization on Red Hat 9 brain tickler.
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:08:41 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> I have two machines here that are each running with 2G of ram. One sees all of 
> its ram and the other only sees 256M. This is ringing a bell in the back of my 
> mind about how to fix it. I can't remember if there's a boot commandline 
> option that's needed or a special kernel-build trick that was needed or what 
> it was. Does anyone remember what the trick was?
> 
> I hate getting old. :-(
> 
> TIA
> 
> -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  
> .0.
> happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
> Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
> individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
> steveo at syslang.net
> 
> -- Shrike-list mailing list
> Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux