This is the case with Sophos. It is the case with a fair percentage of other requests; the first hit, or one of the first few, is the one of interest. The question: Is google *really* that hard to use, still has YES for the answer in the general case. and I'd venture a guess that the post you put up asking of google was that hard to use was no easier than one that included the link to Sophos. Putting both link and chiding in the post would have not taken much either. Break time is over, back to the salt mines. *crack*. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (610)796-5838 >>> mikes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 03/15/04 02:17PM >>> Gimmie a break... go to Google and type "Sophos". The first hit is their web page. Sheesh. Brian T. Brunner <mailto:brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, Google really is that hard to use. > > wading through tons of hits for the ones that matter is not trivial. > > (I found 4 quarters in the street in front of > my house this year... amid 200 pounds of rubbish. > So I'll keep sweeping the street, but not for > the money. Damn wind+neighbors). -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated ********************************************************************** -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
