On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:27, Brian T. Brunner wrote: > Suspect is bug in rh9 installation tools, not in rh9 itself. > > I installed rh9 in 2 systems, serious troubles arose in both. > > One system (Dell PowerEdge 350) rh9 simply cannot be installed. > Currently runs rh7.2, so hardware compatability is not issue. > Installer system runs until after package dependency check, then aborts. > > Other system (oem) original CDs would not boot installer system. > On complaint, susbstitute disks supplied by vendor installed correctly. > > Now you cannot check badblocks on install of RH9, but you could using > earlier version. > > Solution: check badblocks on new disks with older version of > RH, then install new version of RH. Cut one more notch in hat > brim to remember one more irritating detail from experience. > > Before too long, your hat will look like saw blade, and you will > forget the meaning of any particular notch. > ---- bugzilla several times <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174> is one of them You should realize there is an implied contract with an open source project or distro and as a user, you are part of the product itself. While it may be convenient to sit back and criticize, often times the answers to the questions and the resolution of the problems is in the system that was created to handle it... bugzilla - your usage of it to resolve problems, report problems will undoubtedly have great impact upon your success of using it. Craig -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
