On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 01:38, D. D. Brierton wrote:
> Regardless of whether this is the best option, attempting to set this
> using texconfig seems to be generating some kind of error. This is what
> is writtent to the log:
>
> TeX-Config. Start on Thu Dec 4 01:23:53 GMT 2003
> expr: syntax error
> /usr/bin/texconfig: line 890: test: -lt: unary operator expected
> expr: non-numeric argument
> expr: non-numeric argument
> expr: non-numeric argument
> Running mf to create plain base ...
> fmtutil: no info for format `mf'.
> fmtutil: no info for format `mfw'.
> Done.
Replying to my own post in case someone else one day has the same
problem - I have resolved this now. Apparently something changed in the
format of the config files (which in my case live in a separate
directory: /usr/local/share/texmf-var) between tetex 1 and tetex 2 and
texconfig from tetex 2 didn't want to play nicely with my config files
from tetex 1. In the end I just deleted all of them:
rm -fR /usr/local/share/texmf-var/*
and then re-entered my config details in texconfig. Now everything is
working fine.
Best, Darren
--
=====================================================================
D. D. Brierton darren@xxxxxxxxxxx www.dzr-web.com
Trying is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson)
=====================================================================
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
