On Sunday 07 December 2003 1:29 am, Klaasjan Brand wrote: > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 08:04, Steve Snyder wrote: > > It seems that the current GLibC package for RHL v9 is noticably > > slower than the lastest GLibC for RHL v7.3. > > > > I can't think of any reason for the performance difference other than > > the version of GlibC libraries used. For both versions of RHL the > > i686 versions of the respective GLibC RPMs are installed and running > > on a Pentium4 machine. The same version of the Linux kernel is used > > in bother environments. > > Then you are not running "official" Red Hat Linux... do you get the > performance difference also using the latest versions of the Red Hat > kernels for both distributions? True. I'm running the same plain-vanilla 2.4.23 kernel in both instances. That makes a difference in GLibC performance? Thanks for the reply. -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
